In an experiment evaluating five leading AI platforms—OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Google Gemini, HuggingChat, Anthropic’s Claude, and Mistral AI—focus was placed on their capabilities to create an AI financial advisor with minimal technical expertise. Each platform was instructed to help balance $25,000 in investments against $30,000 in debt and analyze trading charts, assessing their ease of setup and output quality.
Rankings:
- OpenAI’s ChatGPT (8.5/10)
- Setup Ease: 4/5
- Results Quality: 4.5/5
- ChatGPT delivered a well-structured financial plan with clear strategies, demonstrating strong contextual awareness despite some features being obscured in the interface.
- Google Gemini (7/10)
- Setup Ease: 4/5
- Results Quality: 3/5
- Notable for its intuitive design, Gemini required detailed prompts for quality outputs and enacted a consultative advice approach, albeit with conservative results.
- HuggingChat (6.5/10)
- Setup Ease: 2/5
- Results Quality: 4.5/5
- HuggingChat offered extensive customization for expert users, successfully matching output quality with ChatGPT, although its complexity made it less user-friendly.
- Claude (5.5/10)
- Setup Ease: 2.5/5
- Results Quality: 3/5
- Claude’s minimalist interface focused on context but delivered generic advice that lacked specificity and clarity.
- Mistral AI (5/10)
- Setup Ease: 2.5/5
- Results Quality: 2.5/5
- Mistral’s complex setup hindered usability, and while it showed promise in interaction design, it produced the least satisfactory financial planning results.
The evaluation concluded that while each platform has distinct advantages and drawbacks, none emerged as a definitive best choice, emphasizing that user preferences and skill levels greatly influence the effectiveness of AI agents. For detailed interactions and results from each platform, users are encouraged to explore further links provided in the original evaluation.
For inquiries, contact AI Security Edge at info@aisecurityedge.com or visit our website at aisecurityedge.com. Follow us for updates and insights.
